Someone said we are all God's sons. This is true to the usage of the Hebrew "Ben", but not verse 17 where is talks about the servants of the prince and verse 18 the people of the prince. This means that David the Prince can't be Jesus unless you are a Davinci Code type theology person.
Someone said we are all God's sons. This is true to the usage of the Hebrew "Ben", but not verse 17 where is talks about the servants of the prince and verse 18 the people of the prince. This means that David the Prince can't be Jesus unless you are a Davinci Code type theology person.
David isn't mentioned anywhere in those scriptures...it is talking about the princes(plural) of Israel and what they are to do in sacrifice and about inheritance both to a servant and the time it will be his until it revert back to the sons of the Prince.
Has nothing to do with the Davidic Covenant
This actually proves my point that the prince is not Jesus, he being the Davidic covenant person. But then again how can the main throne not have anything to do with Jesus and the Davidic covenant. I am thinking the vicerengent of Jesus will be a prince serveing from the tribe of Levi.
The two witnesses could be the prince and his wife, like lampstands in the temple because they are from cohenim.
This would explain Rev. 3:12 where the person who is a pillar in the temple never goes out. BUt you see there were two pillars, Jachin and Boaz in solomon's temple.
To say all believers will live in the temple and never go out is totally allegorizing it.