JFJ Forums

Full Version: Not innocent but not guilty either
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
The subject may confuse you but allow me to bring you a different perspective of the differences between mankind's justice and God's Justice.


I'll give 3 examples of people that were not innocent in God's hand of
Justice but not guilty on mankind's:


OJ Simpson: Not guilty by mankind justice; Not sentenced by Man
                 Not innocent in God's Justice; Sentenced by Divine Justice by being exposed to his sins in public. His reputation had been sentenced. He had to pay his sins with his wealth and reputation.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty

Michael Jackson: Not guilty by mankind justice; Not sentenced by Man
                       Sentenced by Divine Justice by being exposed to his sins in public. His reputation had been sentenced. He had to pay his sins with his wealth and reputation.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty

Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty



Think about it. Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.
Amen. Also, Mark Geragos represented Michael Jackson and Scott Peterson; and Robert Shapiro and Johnnie Cochran represented O.J. Simpson. Who but God represented Jesus of Nazareth, Who is God?



primogenit Wrote:

The subject may confuse you but allow me to bring you a different perspective of the differences between mankind's justice and God's Justice.


I'll give 3 examples of people that were not innocent in God's hand of
Justice but not guilty on mankind's:


OJ Simpson: Not guilty by mankind justice; Not sentenced by Man
                 Not innocent in God's Justice; Sentenced by Divine Justice by being exposed to his sins in public. His reputation had been sentenced. He had to pay his sins with his wealth and reputation.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty

Michael Jackson: Not guilty by mankind justice; Not sentenced by Man
                       Sentenced by Divine Justice by being exposed to his sins in public. His reputation had been sentenced. He had to pay his sins with his wealth and reputation.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty

Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty



Think about it. Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.
primogenit Wrote:

The subject may confuse you but allow me to bring you a different perspective of the differences between mankind's justice and God's Justice.


Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty



Think about it. Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.


Actually, I am having trouble understanding your post.
I thought Chrisitians believe that Jesus was sent
to be moshiach, to be sacrificed, to redeem men of
sin? I interpret your post as saying that he was a mortal man who, after
being murdered by mankind, was rewarded by being "appointed" moshaich.
That this was his reward, not his intended purpose.
It also appears from reading this that you think G-d and Jesus are not
one and the same? I also thought the Trinity was part of Christian doctrine.
So, not it does not make sense to me....maybe you can clarify?
Question
Sheitl Queen Wrote:

primogenit Wrote:

The subject may confuse you but allow me to bring you a different perspective of the differences between mankind's justice and God's Justice.


Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty



Think about it. Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.


Actually, I am having trouble understanding your post.
I thought Chrisitians believe that Jesus was sent
to be moshiach, to be sacrificed, to redeem men of
sin? I interpret your post as saying that he was a mortal man who, after
being murdered by mankind, was rewarded by being "appointed" moshaich.
That this was his reward, not his intended purpose.
It also appears from reading this that you think G-d and Jesus are not
one and the same? I also thought the Trinity was part of Christian doctrine.
So, not it does not make sense to me....maybe you can clarify?
Question



What I'm trying to say is that God works wonders. There are different ways to perceive what's around us. For a lot of people OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson got away with their "crimes". The truth is that they didn't.
Sheitl Queen Wrote:

primogenit Wrote:

The subject may confuse you but allow me to bring you a different perspective of the differences between mankind's justice and God's Justice.


Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty



Think about it. Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.


Actually, I am having trouble understanding your post.
I thought Chrisitians believe that Jesus was sent
to be moshiach, to be sacrificed, to redeem men of
sin? I interpret your post as saying that he was a mortal man who, after
being murdered by mankind, was rewarded by being "appointed" moshaich.
That this was his reward, not his intended purpose.
It also appears from reading this that you think G-d and Jesus are not
one and the same? I also thought the Trinity was part of Christian doctrine.
So, not it does not make sense to me....maybe you can clarify?
Question



Good point Sheitl Queen but I believe you misunderstood me.

No. Jesus is not the same as God. Nothing can be compared or put in the same sentence as God. Not even His Son. Although through Trinity, God would Speak His Word through Jesus. But God also Speaks His Word through us when we became receptive and allow Him.

God Is The Father and Creator; Jesus The Son and Servant, who was made to be King.

God and the Messiah are 2 very different different concepts... Although Jesus represented God.
Sheitl Queen Wrote:

primogenit Wrote:

...Jesus: Not innocent by mankind justice; Sentenced to death by Man
         Not guilty in God's Justice; Not sentenced but saved by God. Rewarded by Divine Justice to be aknowledged as the Messiah and the Saviour by all the man after him.
He wasn't innocent yet not guilty....
Does it make any sense?
Feel free to leave your comments.


Actually, I am having trouble understanding your post.
I thought Chrisitians believe that Jesus was sent
to be moshiach, to be sacrificed, to redeem men of
sin? I interpret your post as saying that he was a mortal man who, after
being murdered by mankind, was rewarded by being "appointed" moshaich....
So, not it does not make sense to me....maybe you can clarify?


Jesus was sent to be Moshiach. Here's your problem: You interpret Isaiah 7 and Isaiah 53 as refering to someone else or Israel. You try to avoid the fact that the Immanuel born of a young woman (who was a virgin) and Who took the sins of the world is Jesus. Read Isaiah 29 if you want a further explanation of why you may not see Jesus as Moshiach; and tell your cohanim when you figure it out.
GoyOfY'shua Wrote:

Jesus was sent to be Moshiach. Here's your problem: You interpret Isaiah 7 and Isaiah 53 as refering to someone else or Israel. You try to avoid the fact that the Immanuel born of a young woman (who was a virgin) and Who took the sins of the world is Jesus. Read Isaiah 29 if you want a further explanation of why you may not see Jesus as Moshiach; and tell your cohanim when you figure it out.


This has nothing to do with what I asked; maybe you can stay on topic?
We are not discussing my or Jewish beliefs here.
I was asking that the OP be clarified because it did not seem to agree
with what the Christians I know believe.

The kohanim were appointed by HaShem to be His priests; by
mocking the kohanim, you mock G-d's word. Surely not a wise
thing to do.
primogenit Wrote:





What I'm trying to say is that God works wonders. There are different ways to perceive what's around us. For a lot of people OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson got away with their "crimes". The truth is that they didn't.


Oh, agreed....I don't think anyone gets away with their crimes....
primogenit Wrote:



Jesus is not the same as God. Nothing can be compared or put in the same sentence as God. Not even His Son. Although through Trinity, God would Speak His Word through Jesus. But God also Speaks His Word through us when we became receptive and allow Him.

God Is The Father and Creator; Jesus The Son and Servant, who was made to be King.

God and the Messiah are 2 very different different concepts... Although Jesus represented God.


Now I'm really confused!
So please correct me if I am misinterepting what you wrote....
If I understand your post, you don't believe Jesus is G-d? He
was a mortal man who you believe became moshiach and is
G-d's representative?
May thanks
I quote...

"Now I'm really confused!
So please correct me if I am misinterepting what you wrote....
If I understand your post, you don't believe Jesus is G-d? He
was a mortal man who you believe became moshiach and is
G-d's representative?
May thanks"



Yes, you are having a totally misinterpretation of what I was on about.
Read my words to understand it.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reference URL's