01-26-2008, 07:22 AM
Do any engineers, nuclear or electrical visit this site? Seems like we have
ignored the very technology that can preserve a greater quantity of life,
and gone for power and comfort. My dad worked for Exxon as an accountant. Cars were not scutinized for fuel efficiency- just looks and speed. Then He worked as a safety consultant for an insurance concern.
His company car got mid-range mileage.
For the 47 years I have lived I have owned 4 bicycles, and 5 cars (with
mileage ranging from 8 to 26 mpg.) The car I drive now 82 model, gets apprx. 18 mpg.
I did a paper on methanol, which proved biomass, green plant and tree
by-products are a readily available source for energy. The process is somewhat more expensive than the process to secure ethanol. Are these processes that we label more costly, in effect less costly in the long run if the R&D is considered a must at the present time?
It is a paradox to see Ford's first car ran on ethanol.
Somewhere in revelation it speaks about hurting the earth.
ignored the very technology that can preserve a greater quantity of life,
and gone for power and comfort. My dad worked for Exxon as an accountant. Cars were not scutinized for fuel efficiency- just looks and speed. Then He worked as a safety consultant for an insurance concern.
His company car got mid-range mileage.
For the 47 years I have lived I have owned 4 bicycles, and 5 cars (with
mileage ranging from 8 to 26 mpg.) The car I drive now 82 model, gets apprx. 18 mpg.
I did a paper on methanol, which proved biomass, green plant and tree
by-products are a readily available source for energy. The process is somewhat more expensive than the process to secure ethanol. Are these processes that we label more costly, in effect less costly in the long run if the R&D is considered a must at the present time?
It is a paradox to see Ford's first car ran on ethanol.
Somewhere in revelation it speaks about hurting the earth.
