I saw Chamah for sun is in this verse and also zaphon and east, but need to check the Heb and am wondering if translators have totally botched this one as being about the antichrist anihilateing when it is really the Lord tenting and anihilateing the wicked.
I shall return.
I am not that good at the Hebrew but it seems like here and other places in Daniel the "he" spoken of is not clear. Who is he, a good guy, a bad guy, God?
The same thing with Daniel 9:26-27, Nadeeb is the same word for the good guy and bad guy, the word means forerunner leader or something like that.
But back to Daniel 11:44-45. Who exactly is the king of the south, who the king of the north?
The rumors he hears from the east, the word for rumors means a stunning thing heard, a silenceing thing.
Azar, no one with strenghten him the word is Azar. This is surround, is could it mean that no one will surround the David Prince? Or does it have to be that no one will support the Antichrist? That kind of doesn't make sense as all the bad guys are dead by the time the antichrist is thrown in the lake of fire.
But the BLB does confirm my thoughts about Chama. Translators have a king going out in a destructive rage, but it could be that many are killed by Chama that sounds like Kimah, cluster.
The words are connected by wine, the heat of wine, and the story of Ham getting drunk.
Japanes people saw california raisin comercials and didn't know what they were. They thought they were danceing potatoes or something.
They didn't have grapes as a part of their culture, or associate raisins with africans appearance.