06-19-2009, 11:40 AM
I'd like to respectfully ask any "Oneness" believers out there an honest, simple and direct question:
If the Bible uses the personal pronouns "we", "us", "our", and uses words like "self" in relation to Yeshua and the Father "I can of my own self do nothing", "He glorified not himself to be high priest", etc. -- indeed, if Yeshua even said he and the Father were "two persons" (Jhn 8:16-18) -- he definitely did not say "two natures" but rather "two anthropos" or persons in the Greek--
Then why is it supposedly wrong to speak of more than one "person" in God's essential nature? You can be a strict Unitarian who believes in only one Triune God.
Since the Bible permits no private interpretation, we must use the publicly accepted definitions of articles of speech and rules of grammar when reading the Word (such as personal pronouns, the word "self", etc.) which identify persons.
I think it is fair to politely question Oneness believers on the grounds of it requiring a private interpretation of the Bible's language and grammar that does not accept the universal definitions of words like "they", "their", "we", "us", and "our" all of which are used to identify distinct persons.
If the Bible uses the personal pronouns "we", "us", "our", and uses words like "self" in relation to Yeshua and the Father "I can of my own self do nothing", "He glorified not himself to be high priest", etc. -- indeed, if Yeshua even said he and the Father were "two persons" (Jhn 8:16-18) -- he definitely did not say "two natures" but rather "two anthropos" or persons in the Greek--
Then why is it supposedly wrong to speak of more than one "person" in God's essential nature? You can be a strict Unitarian who believes in only one Triune God.
Since the Bible permits no private interpretation, we must use the publicly accepted definitions of articles of speech and rules of grammar when reading the Word (such as personal pronouns, the word "self", etc.) which identify persons.
I think it is fair to politely question Oneness believers on the grounds of it requiring a private interpretation of the Bible's language and grammar that does not accept the universal definitions of words like "they", "their", "we", "us", and "our" all of which are used to identify distinct persons.