10-29-2006, 07:55 AM
For those who do not believe in Yeshua, I invite your responses:
In the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is a call for the righteous to:
"...(leave) from the dwelling-place of the men of perversion,
in order that*you*may* go to the Wilderness to prepare the Way for Him, as it is written,
'In the Wilderness, prepare the Way of HASHEM,
make straight in the Desert a MESILAH for our G-D.'
THIS IS THE SEARCH OF THE LAW." (Manual of Discipline 8:13-15)
One of the things left out of our apologia (defense) of Jesus, is how that Jesus not only tore down the wall of partition between Jew and Gentile, but he also tore down the wall of the material world's caste system. In the Torah (Shemos / Exodus 22:28) and in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Manual of Discipline 6:11-12), there is a caste system within pre-Christian Israel in which a man of the Assembly is allowed to speak up only when a leader allows him to do so.
So if a sin is committed by a leader, he is only to be rebuked by one of the same or higher level. If a Judge shall be openly perverse, and accepts an open bribe to influence his verdict before the people, only one of equal or higher standing could rebuke such a one...you were not legally allowed to curse. One who did, was like Hamas - "a violent robber" who regards not Torah or its Great Author [i.e., G-D].
Jesus was never rebuked for slamming the Sanhedrin leaders of Israel.
This was never an issue with the Sanhedrin or in the ensuing generations. Why is that? Why? Unless there was no doubt to His authencity and legal right to Primogeniture and Entail to the entire nation of Judah -- and yes, even Israel itself. In other words, they KNEW Him to be the top-most son of David in succession to the Throne.
There was NEVER a question of Jesus' Davidic lineage in the worst of Jesus enemies. There was purposeful slander by knowing malicious insinuation in using Beelzebub. The Great Sanhedrin and their followers would have had the power, the means, the motivation, to thoroughly investigate the genealogical records in the Book of Days: family member by family member, neighbor by neighbor, as to whether Jesus could legally be an heir to David or not. In their minds, Jesus fully qualified as an heir of David, virgin born or not, because He qualified doubly under the weight of the legal citations within Bamidbar/Numbers chapter 36.
So when we see the exchanges such as in Matthew 12:24-32, Jesus is telling the Pharisees that they are in violation of the Torah in cursing Him (Yeshua), because these are of a lower caste. In Matthew 12:27, Jesus severely rebukes these for violating the Torah, and accuses them of practicing "lawlessness" for teaching to curse one of a higher caste than themselves. The text also shows Jesus very subtle but repeated affirmation of being fully of Jewish/Davidic stock in his human lineage.
So when a Jew today seeks to keep the Law, but curses Jesus, He is violating Torah. Let them remove themselves to the desert and study Torah alone there, and build the exalted embankment of HASHEM straight, a life in Tzedek/tzedekah, even as Saul who became Paul had done for 3 years. For the exalted embankment and WAY of the SALVATION / YESHUA of the G-D of Israel is truly "the search of the law" -- as Manual of Discipline 8:13-15 infers. Shalom.
In the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is a call for the righteous to:
"...(leave) from the dwelling-place of the men of perversion,
in order that*you*may* go to the Wilderness to prepare the Way for Him, as it is written,
'In the Wilderness, prepare the Way of HASHEM,
make straight in the Desert a MESILAH for our G-D.'
THIS IS THE SEARCH OF THE LAW." (Manual of Discipline 8:13-15)
One of the things left out of our apologia (defense) of Jesus, is how that Jesus not only tore down the wall of partition between Jew and Gentile, but he also tore down the wall of the material world's caste system. In the Torah (Shemos / Exodus 22:28) and in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Manual of Discipline 6:11-12), there is a caste system within pre-Christian Israel in which a man of the Assembly is allowed to speak up only when a leader allows him to do so.
So if a sin is committed by a leader, he is only to be rebuked by one of the same or higher level. If a Judge shall be openly perverse, and accepts an open bribe to influence his verdict before the people, only one of equal or higher standing could rebuke such a one...you were not legally allowed to curse. One who did, was like Hamas - "a violent robber" who regards not Torah or its Great Author [i.e., G-D].
Jesus was never rebuked for slamming the Sanhedrin leaders of Israel.
This was never an issue with the Sanhedrin or in the ensuing generations. Why is that? Why? Unless there was no doubt to His authencity and legal right to Primogeniture and Entail to the entire nation of Judah -- and yes, even Israel itself. In other words, they KNEW Him to be the top-most son of David in succession to the Throne.
There was NEVER a question of Jesus' Davidic lineage in the worst of Jesus enemies. There was purposeful slander by knowing malicious insinuation in using Beelzebub. The Great Sanhedrin and their followers would have had the power, the means, the motivation, to thoroughly investigate the genealogical records in the Book of Days: family member by family member, neighbor by neighbor, as to whether Jesus could legally be an heir to David or not. In their minds, Jesus fully qualified as an heir of David, virgin born or not, because He qualified doubly under the weight of the legal citations within Bamidbar/Numbers chapter 36.
So when we see the exchanges such as in Matthew 12:24-32, Jesus is telling the Pharisees that they are in violation of the Torah in cursing Him (Yeshua), because these are of a lower caste. In Matthew 12:27, Jesus severely rebukes these for violating the Torah, and accuses them of practicing "lawlessness" for teaching to curse one of a higher caste than themselves. The text also shows Jesus very subtle but repeated affirmation of being fully of Jewish/Davidic stock in his human lineage.
So when a Jew today seeks to keep the Law, but curses Jesus, He is violating Torah. Let them remove themselves to the desert and study Torah alone there, and build the exalted embankment of HASHEM straight, a life in Tzedek/tzedekah, even as Saul who became Paul had done for 3 years. For the exalted embankment and WAY of the SALVATION / YESHUA of the G-D of Israel is truly "the search of the law" -- as Manual of Discipline 8:13-15 infers. Shalom.