JFJ Forums

Full Version: Here's A Hint For Non-Messianic Orthodox Jews
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
align=left] Then the Pharisees and scribes asked Him, “Why do Your disciples not walk according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashed hands?”  He answered and said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written:


      ‘ This people honors Me with their lips,
      But their heart is far from Me.
      And in vain they worship Me,
      Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’[/align]

(Mark 7:5-7, NKJV)



Therefore the Lord said:


      “ Inasmuch as these people draw near with their mouths
      And honor Me with their lips,
      But have removed their hearts far from Me,
      And their fear toward Me is taught by the commandment of men,"



Isaiah 29:13



well said,Gene Scott said..."man makes void the word of God thru tradition...."
Life is mostly froth and bubble,
Two things stand like stone.
Kindness in another's trouble,
Courage in your own.

Adam Lindsey Gordon
  <(((((((<
The Jews were told over and over again not to come to G-d in a prefunctiary manner.  To only come to do the sacrifices as something that they had to do - instead of out of want and love - repulsed G-d.  G-d repeatedly told them, throughout Isaiah especially, but also through David's writting, that to follow the Law as a chore means nothing to G-d.

Which could be what Jesus is getting at.  Just because you follow the Law does not mean you are following G-d.  Just because someone washes their hands, or makes sacrifices, or says the right words does not make them right with G-d.

But does this really mean that Jesus is saying that the commandments should be tossed out the window for what Paul introduced as Christianity?  No.  The Law was given by G-d - an eternal covenant between Him and His people.  No where does it say that such a change as introduced into Christianity was going to happen.  The covenants are everlasting.  Period.  

And, for the argument that's probably going to come, how can Jesus be the fulfillment of something that was already completed?  The Messiah is to lead the world to follow G-d - but to say that Jesus fulfills the Law means that something was lacking to begin with.  That G-d gave an imperfect system to be followed. How can that be - when the Law is a gift, engraved on our hearts so that we can know G-d and do His will fully?

The verses you quoted only show how people fail when they go on their own.  Not when the follow the Law.  
EmmaG Wrote:

The Jews were told over and over again not to come to G-d in a prefunctiary manner.  To only come to do the sacrifices as something that they had to do - instead of out of want and love - repulsed G-d.  G-d repeatedly told them, throughout Isaiah especially, but also through David's writting, that to follow the Law as a chore means nothing to G-d.

Which could be what Jesus is getting at.  Just because you follow the Law does not mean you are following G-d.  Just because someone washes their hands, or makes sacrifices, or says the right words does not make them right with G-d.

But does this really mean that Jesus is saying that the commandments should be tossed out the window for what Paul introduced as Christianity?  No.  The Law was given by G-d - an eternal covenant between Him and His people.  No where does it say that such a change as introduced into Christianity was going to happen.  The covenants are everlasting.  Period.  

And, for the argument that's probably going to come, how can Jesus be the fulfillment of something that was already completed?  The Messiah is to lead the world to follow G-d - but to say that Jesus fulfills the Law means that something was lacking to begin with.  That G-d gave an imperfect system to be followed. How can that be - when the Law is a gift, engraved on our hearts so that we can know G-d and do His will fully?

The verses you quoted only show how people fail when they go on their own.  Not when the follow the Law.  


No one is saying the commandments should be tossed out.  The only way we could ever possibly keep the commandments is through Christ's strength.  "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." And in another place the bible says, 'Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says the LORD Almighty. (Zachariah 4:6)  And even if we do not keep the commandments we have God's grace through Jesus Christ.  Jesus Christ is our advocate when we fail.  When you're trying to keep the commandments on your own strength, grace is not involved (something we all desparately need).  Personally, I do not want God's justice for my life - I want his grace and mercy.  If I get justice, I'm in trouble.  
BornAgain Wrote:

EmmaG Wrote:

The Jews were told over and over again not to come to G-d in a prefunctiary manner.  To only come to do the sacrifices as something that they had to do - instead of out of want and love - repulsed G-d.  G-d repeatedly told them, throughout Isaiah especially, but also through David's writting, that to follow the Law as a chore means nothing to G-d.

Which could be what Jesus is getting at.  Just because you follow the Law does not mean you are following G-d.  Just because someone washes their hands, or makes sacrifices, or says the right words does not make them right with G-d.

But does this really mean that Jesus is saying that the commandments should be tossed out the window for what Paul introduced as Christianity?  No.  The Law was given by G-d - an eternal covenant between Him and His people.  No where does it say that such a change as introduced into Christianity was going to happen.  The covenants are everlasting.  Period.  

And, for the argument that's probably going to come, how can Jesus be the fulfillment of something that was already completed?  The Messiah is to lead the world to follow G-d - but to say that Jesus fulfills the Law means that something was lacking to begin with.  That G-d gave an imperfect system to be followed. How can that be - when the Law is a gift, engraved on our hearts so that we can know G-d and do His will fully?

The verses you quoted only show how people fail when they go on their own.  Not when the follow the Law.  


No one is saying the commandments should be tossed out.  The only way we could ever possibly keep the commandments is through Christ's strength.  "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." And in another place the bible says, 'Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says the LORD Almighty. (Zachariah 4:6)  And even if we do not keep the commandments we have God's grace through Jesus Christ.  Jesus Christ is our advocate when we fail.  When you're trying to keep the commandments on your own strength, grace is not involved (something we all desparately need).  Personally, I do not want God's justice for my life - I want his grace and mercy.  If I get justice, I'm in trouble.  



Why in the world would G-d create an everlasting covenant of salvation with his chosen people if they couldn't do it? Ever?

Or toss in the caveat that we all need Jesus in order to do so - and then not provide this missing link for a few thousands years?

The answer is that He did not do this.  G-d gave the Law because we could fulfill it.  We don't need Jesus to do it.  Instead we do it with G-d alone.

You start by loving G-d with your whole being, as he has asked us to.  Then following his commandments and doing his will comes simply - and we do it with great joy.

Christians often argue that G-d is a just G-d.  Then they say that they are under his grace.  Does this mean that you are not going to be exposed to G-d's justice?  No, not at all.  Even in your own scriptures, in Revelation, there is a judgement for both beleivers and non-believers.

Fortuantely for all of us G-d's mercy is infinte.  He does not demand perfection from a creation he knows cannot achieve this.  Nor will he judge on us on a failure to be perfect.  

The Law is a gift - a beautiful blessing.  It is not a burden, a prison or a chore.  It is not something to be done with drudgery or even fear but with relish and love. And to follow the Law is completely possible with out Jesus.  No one said one was to follow the Law without G-d.  G-d said this was not his wish time and time again.

And if you want an example of where it is possible to follow the Law without Jesus look at the parents of John the Baptist.  They were doing this before Jesus' birth.
One of the things that can be viewed in how glorious worship can be, is the songs or Psalms that are sung unto the L-RD.

By far, Christianity has those songs which are on the highest order of worship and praise to G-D.  Mind you, not all...but if we were to look at hymns from the Wesleys onward...we would find many, many examples on the highest order.

What are the praises of the lips that most glorifies G-D?  We are able to shout like the angels, and sing like the cherubim...and in unison of congregational reading, duplicate the faint echoes (as it were) of the sound of YHVeH's speech...whose "voice" is as the sound of multitudes of people speaking, accompanied by the sounds of running streams and rivers of waters.

They who keep harping on "praises" of the lips as means of sufficient sacrifice, once again fall into a category of works and Isaiah 29:13, as Goy has cited.  

If such praises are effectual, why was there ever a need for Temple bloody sacrifices?  Why are we in such an era as we are in now, so that sacrifices are no longer needed?  

Our adversaries are incapable of honestly answering these questions, because the true reality of the answers are found exclusively in Jesus Christ.  Shalom.
EmmaG Wrote:

BornAgain Wrote:

EmmaG Wrote:

The Jews were told over and over again not to come to G-d in a prefunctiary manner.  To only come to do the sacrifices as something that they had to do - instead of out of want and love - repulsed G-d.  G-d repeatedly told them, throughout Isaiah especially, but also through David's writting, that to follow the Law as a chore means nothing to G-d.

Which could be what Jesus is getting at.  Just because you follow the Law does not mean you are following G-d.  Just because someone washes their hands, or makes sacrifices, or says the right words does not make them right with G-d.

But does this really mean that Jesus is saying that the commandments should be tossed out the window for what Paul introduced as Christianity?  No.  The Law was given by G-d - an eternal covenant between Him and His people.  No where does it say that such a change as introduced into Christianity was going to happen.  The covenants are everlasting.  Period.  

And, for the argument that's probably going to come, how can Jesus be the fulfillment of something that was already completed?  The Messiah is to lead the world to follow G-d - but to say that Jesus fulfills the Law means that something was lacking to begin with.  That G-d gave an imperfect system to be followed. How can that be - when the Law is a gift, engraved on our hearts so that we can know G-d and do His will fully?

The verses you quoted only show how people fail when they go on their own.  Not when the follow the Law.  


No one is saying the commandments should be tossed out.  The only way we could ever possibly keep the commandments is through Christ's strength.  "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." And in another place the bible says, 'Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says the LORD Almighty. (Zachariah 4:6)  And even if we do not keep the commandments we have God's grace through Jesus Christ.  Jesus Christ is our advocate when we fail.  When you're trying to keep the commandments on your own strength, grace is not involved (something we all desparately need).  Personally, I do not want God's justice for my life - I want his grace and mercy.  If I get justice, I'm in trouble.  



Why in the world would G-d create an everlasting covenant of salvation with his chosen people if they couldn't do it? Ever?

Or toss in the caveat that we all need Jesus in order to do so - and then not provide this missing link for a few thousands years?

The answer is that He did not do this.  G-d gave the Law because we could fulfill it.  We don't need Jesus to do it.  Instead we do it with G-d alone.

You start by loving G-d with your whole being, as he has asked us to.  Then following his commandments and doing his will comes simply - and we do it with great joy.

Christians often argue that G-d is a just G-d.  Then they say that they are under his grace.  Does this mean that you are not going to be exposed to G-d's justice?  No, not at all.  Even in your own scriptures, in Revelation, there is a judgement for both beleivers and non-believers.

Fortuantely for all of us G-d's mercy is infinte.  He does not demand perfection from a creation he knows cannot achieve this.  Nor will he judge on us on a failure to be perfect.  

The Law is a gift - a beautiful blessing.  It is not a burden, a prison or a chore.  It is not something to be done with drudgery or even fear but with relish and love. And to follow the Law is completely possible with out Jesus.  No one said one was to follow the Law without G-d.  G-d said this was not his wish time and time again.

And if you want an example of where it is possible to follow the Law without Jesus look at the parents of John the Baptist.  They were doing this before Jesus' birth.


But Abraham's faith was credited to him as righteousness, and Elizabeth said that John leaped for joy when Mary came by to visit because of Jesus of Nazareth being in her womb. EmmaG, you have totally been one who tasted grace then fell away. Jesus of Nazareth is Messiah, whether you like it or not.
EmmaG Wrote:

BornAgain Wrote:

EmmaG Wrote:

The Jews were told over and over again not to come to G-d in a prefunctiary manner.  To only come to do the sacrifices as something that they had to do - instead of out of want and love - repulsed G-d.  G-d repeatedly told them, throughout Isaiah especially, but also through David's writting, that to follow the Law as a chore means nothing to G-d.

Which could be what Jesus is getting at.  Just because you follow the Law does not mean you are following G-d.  Just because someone washes their hands, or makes sacrifices, or says the right words does not make them right with G-d.

But does this really mean that Jesus is saying that the commandments should be tossed out the window for what Paul introduced as Christianity?  No.  The Law was given by G-d - an eternal covenant between Him and His people.  No where does it say that such a change as introduced into Christianity was going to happen.  The covenants are everlasting.  Period.  

And, for the argument that's probably going to come, how can Jesus be the fulfillment of something that was already completed?  The Messiah is to lead the world to follow G-d - but to say that Jesus fulfills the Law means that something was lacking to begin with.  That G-d gave an imperfect system to be followed. How can that be - when the Law is a gift, engraved on our hearts so that we can know G-d and do His will fully?

The verses you quoted only show how people fail when they go on their own.  Not when the follow the Law.  


No one is saying the commandments should be tossed out.  The only way we could ever possibly keep the commandments is through Christ's strength.  "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." And in another place the bible says, 'Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says the LORD Almighty. (Zachariah 4:6)  And even if we do not keep the commandments we have God's grace through Jesus Christ.  Jesus Christ is our advocate when we fail.  When you're trying to keep the commandments on your own strength, grace is not involved (something we all desparately need).  Personally, I do not want God's justice for my life - I want his grace and mercy.  If I get justice, I'm in trouble.  



Why in the world would G-d create an everlasting covenant of salvation with his chosen people if they couldn't do it? Ever?

Or toss in the caveat that we all need Jesus in order to do so - and then not provide this missing link for a few thousands years?

The answer is that He did not do this.  G-d gave the Law because we could fulfill it.  We don't need Jesus to do it.  Instead we do it with G-d alone.

You start by loving G-d with your whole being, as he has asked us to.  Then following his commandments and doing his will comes simply - and we do it with great joy.

Christians often argue that G-d is a just G-d.  Then they say that they are under his grace.  Does this mean that you are not going to be exposed to G-d's justice?  No, not at all.  Even in your own scriptures, in Revelation, there is a judgement for both beleivers and non-believers.

Fortuantely for all of us G-d's mercy is infinte.  He does not demand perfection from a creation he knows cannot achieve this.  Nor will he judge on us on a failure to be perfect.  

The Law is a gift - a beautiful blessing.  It is not a burden, a prison or a chore.  It is not something to be done with drudgery or even fear but with relish and love. And to follow the Law is completely possible with out Jesus.  No one said one was to follow the Law without G-d.  G-d said this was not his wish time and time again.

And if you want an example of where it is possible to follow the Law without Jesus look at the parents of John the Baptist.  They were doing this before Jesus' birth.


When God sees the Christian, He sees perfection because He sees His Son Jesus in the Christian.  When He sees a non-Christian He sees their sins and imperfections because they are not covered by the blood of Jesus.  In other words, God's grace rests upon believers, not non-believers.  Non-believers will be given justice (without mercy).  The law only shows us that all mankind are sinners.  Whether we have Jesus as our Savior is what we'll be judged by, not whether or not we were able to follow the law (because God knows we can't).  The whole Old Testament was written to show us that we can't follow it.  Look at how many times the Jews sinned and God forgave them, then they would sin again, and again God would forgive them, and then they would sin again, and over and over and over.  They kept sinning and God kept forgiving them.  But Jesus predicted that the Jews would be dispersed among the nations because of their unbelief - because He (Jesus) came as the Messiah and they missed it.  And so in 70 A.D. they were dispersed among the nations, just as Jesus predicted.  But God had also predicted that He would gather them again. And He did in 1948/1967 and still today they are being gathered from among the nations. But not because of anything the Jews have done but because God is faithful to His Word.  
Thankyou Brian, While I agree that the law is perfect and holy, and directs us to love God completely as He loves us it is ludicrous and self patronizing to think that any man is up to that challenge.
Gods mercy is as infinite as His Holiness and anyone who fails to see this misses the "need" for the crucifixion.

Emma: You stated that God will not judge man on a standard of perfection. I'm wondering why Im not basking in the rays of Eden right now. Oh thats right, for the sake of one sin man was cast from fellowship and creation cursed. I guess Eve had similar hopes.
Surely you are aware that John's father was struck mute for not believing God. That was just a gentile tap on the shoulder.
I appreciate your views on the law however.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's