| The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James |
| Author |
Message |
beacon2
Member
  
Posts: 237
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
|
|
The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Faith "plus works" has come up in the "how to be saved" thread several times so a separate thread on this is probably in order.
Beacon: No one has said that we are not saved through faith. No one has said that we are not saved through the blood of Messiah. No one has said that we are not saved through repentance. All of these things are essential.
Now lets be clear on this. I am saying that we are saved through the substitutionary blood of Messiah. It is through alone that we find propitiation and reconciliation. Faith dictates a responce. That responce is obedience found in faith, repentance, and baptism........ .
However you propose a person to be saved without a proper responce to the gospel {especially when that responce is made evident}. Without works faith is dead. ..................
Joshua ,
Faith does not dictate a response as you state. This is the gospel of James. The Gospel of Jesus Christ does call for a response from the hearer, but that response is faith only. God looks on the heart of that person, then effects the new birth of the Spirit of the believer, and the process of salvation is then complete. In the Words of our Lord, below is the "proper" response to the Gospel:
John 6:28-29
28 Then they asked him, "What must we do to do the works God requires?"
29 Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent." (NIV)
The only obedience that we are called to under the New Covenant is to believe the Gospel. However, obedience/works inevitably follow a born again believer as a result of the Holy Spirit’s work in that believer. But those works do not effect salvation in a believer.
You cannot have faith without obedience. Abraham manifest faiths demands that he get up and leave caldea even if circumscion came 11 years later. When a person understands baptism to be a command he has two options 1. submit to all righteousness {as Messiah did before John} or 2. reason this command away as not literal.
I've been where you are. Faith and baptism are synoptic.
By the way, in your estimation what happens to a believer if he does not get baptized in "water" as you and many others believe that he should?
|
|
| 01-18-2008 07:14 AM |
|
 |
menorot
Member
  
Posts: 57
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2006
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Faith "plus works" has come up in the "how to be saved" thread several times so a separate thread on this is probably in order.
Beacon: No one has said that we are not saved through faith. No one has said that we are not saved through the blood of Messiah. No one has said that we are not saved through repentance. All of these things are essential.
Now lets be clear on this. I am saying that we are saved through the substitutionary blood of Messiah. It is through alone that we find propitiation and reconciliation. Faith dictates a responce. That responce is obedience found in faith, repentance, and baptism........ .
However you propose a person to be saved without a proper responce to the gospel {especially when that responce is made evident}. Without works faith is dead. ..................
Joshua ,
Faith does not dictate a response as you state. This is the gospel of James. The Gospel of Jesus Christ does call for a response from the hearer, but that response is faith only. God looks on the heart of that person, then effects the new birth of the Spirit of the believer, and the process of salvation is then complete. In the Words of our Lord, below is the "proper" response to the Gospel:
John 6:28-29
28 Then they asked him, "What must we do to do the works God requires?"
29 Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent." (NIV)
The only obedience that we are called to under the New Covenant is to believe the Gospel. However, obedience/works inevitably follow a born again believer as a result of the Holy Spirit’s work in that believer. But those works do not effect salvation in a believer.
You cannot have faith without obedience. Abraham manifest faiths demands that he get up and leave caldea even if circumscion came 11 years later. When a person understands baptism to be a command he has two options 1. submit to all righteousness {as Messiah did before John} or 2. reason this command away as not literal.
I've been where you are. Faith and baptism are synoptic.
By the way, in your estimation what happens to a believer if he does not get baptized in "water" as you and many others believe that he should?
Just a reminder that James was Jesus' brother, and he was leader of the Jerusalem church after Jesus' ascension. James was very aware of what Jesus taught, and there should be no contradiction (although there may be paradoxes).
http://www.menorot.com/shebaspage.htm
I have been a trained nurse for over 40 years. My calling is to encourage, support and help.
I try not to argue, and I ignore trolls.
|
|
| 01-24-2008 03:14 AM |
|
 |
cor517
I Should Get A Medal for So Much Posting!
Posts: 1,558
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2006
|
|
| 01-25-2008 08:15 AM |
|
 |
beacon2
Member
  
Posts: 237
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Just a reminder that James was Jesus' brother, and he was leader of the Jerusalem church after Jesus' ascension. James was very aware of what Jesus taught, and there should be no contradiction (although there may be paradoxes).
Hi menorot!
Two things. It is not a certainty that James the brother of Jesus wrote the epistle of James.
And, whoever wrote it, regardless of his relation to Christ, confused the process of sanctification with justification, and thus created a toxic doctrine of “faith plus works” that has plagued the church for centuries.
More on this soon.
|
|
| 01-26-2008 10:35 AM |
|
 |
beacon2
Member
  
Posts: 237
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Grace, (the word) is not found in the book of James.
A telling sign cor517. I hadn't noticed that.
|
|
| 01-26-2008 10:41 AM |
|
 |
beacon2
Member
  
Posts: 237
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Here is the Gospel of our Lord as He and Paul proclaimed it:
John 3:16
16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. (NIV)
John 3:18
18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. (NIV)
John 6:28-29
28 Then they asked him, "What must we do to do the works God requires?" (NIV)
29 Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent." (NIV)
The apostle Paul reiterated what our Lord said this way:
Rom 3:21-22
21 But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify.
22 This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, …………….. (NIV)
And here is how the author of James directly contradicts the Word of our Lord with this conclusion in James 2:24:
24 You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone. (NIV)
Now church scholars have consistently and repeatedly bent over backwards with all kinds of pretzel-like arguments to try and reconcile what James wrote with what our Lord said. They tell us that what we read in James 2:24 doesn’t really mean what any reader's eyes and intellect can plainly grasp.
One of their favorite lines is the formula: “justification is by faith alone but by a faith that is not alone.” This is attributed to Luther and has been around since the time of the reformation.
But the reformers were just playing semantics here. If justification is by faith alone, then nothing else is needed--period! Cut out the spin!
For if in fact justification is by faith that is not alone as they say, then it follows that justification is not by faith alone. If this is true, James and the Catholic church must be right--justification is by faith plus works--and our Lord was mistaken.
|
|
| 01-28-2008 05:55 AM |
|
 |
Joshua
Senior Member
   
Posts: 486
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2007
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
beacon: Fist, I have no idea about those who are unbaptised. My preference is that if someone did not know that this was Gods will it would be covered under the death of Messiah in the category of sin offering as one of the numerous sins we still commit in ignorance. However as there is a clear direction given for the ordinance of baptism I would be remiss if I did not make others aware of it. I do not believe that water is salvic however there is a strong insinuation that it is the location where the blood of Messiah is applied. Baptism is not a work any more than repentance is. To say that I believe ans not repent and bear fruit demonstrates a false conversion. Even Messiah said that any vines that did not bear fruit would be discarded in the fire.
We can pick and choose which verses suit our theology but that is not fair to the total truth revealed in all of scriptures council. You spend an awfull lot of time on faith but none on bloods propitiation and redemption. So is faith good enough to save without atonement or is there a synoptic interworking between all ingredience provided for salvation. We are never told that baptism or obedience is a work. Rather it is a privelege. I do not see faith as being a passive attribute but something that requires a responce in the form of worship of which living an honoring life to our Lord is.
I would be inclined to agree that if a believer is living a holy life based only on law they do so from the wrong motives.
I am of the opinion that a tithe is a good thing as long as it is submitted to cheerfully and not from the motive that I must to establish or reaffirm my original justified position in Messiah.
Faith must be defined through a faithfull life of submitting to the One you call Master. That submitting should be joyfull, for the most part, and even when it is not we know that if we follow his will we do so to edify the body and bring about a greater righteousness which will have its own reward. The tree doesn't work to bear fruit. It just does because it obeys its God given purpose.
|
|
| 01-29-2008 08:33 AM |
|
 |
cor517
I Should Get A Medal for So Much Posting!
Posts: 1,558
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2006
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Beacon2,
What can you do for me? Just kidding!
I see what you are driving at.
We are not in a contest, neither are we considering gain to be a mark of G_d on our side. We are neither considering the amount of work(s) accomplished as a measure of our faith!
I would say that a lot of people might be "turned off" to real fellowship with Christ, by those measuring their faith by accomplishment(s).
tsk tsk
____-------_____+++++
Peace to you
http://home.earthlink.net/~dwainfred/the...suschrist/
FOR THE LORD YOUR GOD IS A MERCIFUL GOD HE WILL NOT LEAVE THEE NOR FORSAKE THEE. DEUT 4:31
|
|
| 01-31-2008 02:35 AM |
|
 |
beacon2
Member
  
Posts: 237
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
beacon: Fist, I have no idea about those who are unbaptised. My preference is that if someone did not know that this was Gods will it would be covered under the death of Messiah in the category of sin offering as one of the numerous sins we still commit in ignorance. However as there is a clear direction given for the ordinance of baptism I would be remiss if I did not make others aware of it. I do not believe that water is salvic however there is a strong insinuation that it is the location where the blood of Messiah is applied.
Joshua, the scriptures do not support your belief that forgiveness of sins (the blood) is applied to a believer when they are baptized in water.
If, in fact, Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross was not sufficient and complete for God to grant forgiveness of sins to all men right then (once Christ said “It is finished” ), then Christ would still be in the grave.
If in order to grant forgiveness, in addition to Christ’s shed blood God required repentance, belief, baptism of water, etc., from each man that Christ stood in for on the Cross, God would not have raised Christ from the dead.
But Christ’s resurrection, both spiritual and physical, is a sign to all men that God’s justice was fully satisfied and men’s sins were taken away then.
Paul puts it this way:
1 Cor 15:16-18
16 For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either.
17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.
18 Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. (NIV)
And the author of Hebrews says:
Heb 9:12
12 He [Christ] did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.
Heb 9:28
28 so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him. (NIV)
|
|
| 01-31-2008 06:59 AM |
|
 |
YehudiahOfYeshua
The Political Teenager
Posts: 2,514
Group: Registered
Joined: Oct 2006
|
|
RE: The Gospel of Christ vs the gospel of James
Obedience comes from faith, then faith and obedience are complementary and supplementary. Faith is righteousness, and works evidence the faith. Also, baptism with the Holy Spirit and fire count more than water baptism.
You cannot have faith without obedience. Abraham manifest faiths demands that he get up and leave caldea even if circumscion came 11 years later. When a person understands baptism to be a command he has two options 1. submit to all righteousness {as Messiah did before John} or 2. reason this command away as not literal.
I've been where you are. Faith and baptism are synoptic.
I only use the NKJV and the Complete Jewish Bible versions unless I can't find or don't have them.
|
|
| 01-31-2008 08:14 AM |
|
 |
|
Pages (37):
« First
[1]
2
3
4
5
»
Last »
|